Kodak 1247576

Articles and Reviews

04 Nov 2008 V1073 is better than you may think. The 4 stars are relative. Obviously there are better cameras available, but the price is right for the features this camera has. The lack of protruding buttons (other than the zoom) makes the design ideal for pocket or bag. I also like the under-designed body. That's a big change for Kodak towards better products.

The image quality is quite good - especially if your main photography goal is convenience. Low light performance is also good thanks to a larger chip than most compact cameras h... –The Folded Spacefrom Amazon.com
20 Sep 2008 Worst ever! I bought this camera and tried for a week. Do not buy this camera if you gonna use it outdoors. It's almost impossible to see anything on the big lcd screen on a bright day. For indoors low light situations is a okay camera. Movie mode: I can't say I recorded in HD quality because you need the camera dock to view it in your TV. But when transferred the movies to the computer, the quality is not that great and it skips when played back, and I used a 8gb 150x card. The ... –Snap fanfrom Amazon.com
29 Jul 2008 Frustratingly decent camera with severe limitations It's hard to choose a Kodak subcompact today when Canon remains the standard, with consistent quality through the years. If a particular Canon model is not the leader in it's class it's always a solid 2nd or 3rd, and no company has maintained such consistent standards in this catagory over the years. With such a time-tested pedigree why would anyone choose to NOT buy a Canon? Kodak, by comparison, has nearly vanished from the high end, with the majority of its models sub 100$ generic mediocrit... –Gene Vostokfrom Amazon.com

read more reviews at Amazon.com 

• facebook
• stumbleupon
• del.icio.us
• google
• yahoo
• wink