flag |
forum |
feedback |
use old site
KWorld 1680ex TV BOX
— KWORLD KW-SA220 —
|
For the best deal on the KWorld 1680ex TV BOX, you'll want to compare prices before you buy. Our list of stores carrying the KWorld 1680ex TV BOX (located below) tracks merchants who often have bargain prices and great sales. If you don't see a price you like, you can always set a price alert, and we'll tell you when it's cheap. To make sure the deal is for real, we always verify the price at the merchant's website before we send you email. We've been verifying price alerts since 2003... something no other site does today.
X
Click here to save a note about this item. Your notes will show up when you search!
|
Prices based on ground shipping (change)
to 95054: (change)
KWORLD KW-SA220
lowest base price, without shipping and tax
We found 4 listings for the KWorld 1680ex TV BOX (KWORLD KW-SA220):
Articles and Reviews
Reviews by Users
23 Jul 2008



Easy and Affordable Solution
Bought this item when it was $50, and worth every dollar. I'm currently a student at a university, living in an apartment. I was hoping to find a way to use my 22" lcd as a TV for game consoles, as well as a TV. The product looks sleek and delivers exactly what it states it will. Sure, outputting from my PS3 at 720p doesn't look as sharp as it could on an hdtv, but its hundreds of dollars cheaper and gets the job done well enough.
PIP feature is very nice. Noticed that the stand doesn't r...
–Jonathan Masukawafrom Amazon.com
18 Jul 2008



Great
I bought this a year ago for 50 bucks. Great converter allows me to play my ps2 (now ps3) on my computer monitor. Allows composite and YPBR Component hookups. Component looks so nice, the only thing I can think of as a negative is it's not HD compatible, but it works erfect as advertised. Also Great to convert your Monitor to watch television obiously (Standalone, no PC needed, just the monitor)
–Joseph L. Mejiafrom Amazon.com
30 May 2008



not "high quality image"
Eventually returned this item. While the device itself is a good idea, the lack of image quality, specifically the image jumping around all the time, was too much to handle. Its cheap and poorly made, and it shows.
–K. Knobelspiessefrom Amazon.com